Andrew Jackson (March 15, 1767 – June 8, 1845) was the seventh President
of the United States (1829–1837). He was military governor of Florida (1821),
commander of the American forces at the Battle of New Orleans (1815), and eponym
of the era of Jacksonian democracy. He was a polarizing figure who dominated
American politics in the 1820s and 1830s. His political ambition combined with
widening political participation, shaping the modern Democratic Party.[1]
Renowned for his toughness, he was nicknamed “Old Hickory.” As he based his
career in developing Tennessee, Jackson was the first president primarily
associated with the frontier..
JACKSON, Andrew, seventh
president of the United States, born in the Waxhaw settlement on the border
between North and South Carolina, 15 March, 1767; died at the Hermitage, near
Nashville, Tennessee, 8 June, 1845. His father, Andrew Jackson, came over from
Carrickfergus, on the north coast of Ireland, in 1765. His grandfather, Hugh
Jackson, had been a linen-draper. His mother's name was Elizabeth Hutchinson,
and her family were linen-weavers. Andrew Jackson, the father, died a few days
before the birth of his son.
The log cabin in which the future president was born was situated within a
quarter of a mile of the boundary between the two Carolinas, and the people of
the neighborhood do not seem to have had a clear idea as to which province it
belonged. In a letter of 24 December, 1830, in the proclamation addressed to the
nullifiers, in 1832, and again in his will, General Jackson speaks of himself as
a native of South Carolina; but the evidence adduced by Patton seems to show
that the birthplace was north of the border. Three weeks after the birth of her
son Mrs. Jackson moved to the house of her brother-in-law, Mr. Crawford, just
over the border in South Carolina, near the Waxhaw creek, and there his early
years were passed. His education, obtained in an "old-field
school," consisted of little more than the "three R's,"
and even in that limited sphere his attainments were but scanty. He never
learned, in the course of his life, to write English correctly.
His career as a fighter began early. In the spring and early summer of 1780,
after the disastrous surrender of Lincoln's army at Charleston, the whole of
South Carolina was overrun by the British. On 6 August, Jackson was present at
Hanging Rock when Sumter surprised and destroyed a British regiment. Two of his
brothers, as well as his mother, died from hardships sustained in the war. In
after years he could remember how he had been carried as prisoner to Camden and
nearly starved there, and how a brutal officer had cut him with a sword because
he refused to clean his boots; these reminiscences kept alive his hatred for the
British, and doubtless gave unction to the tremendous blow dealt them at New
Orleans.
In 1781, left quite alone in the world, he was apprenticed for a while to a
saddler. At one time he is said to have done a little teaching in an "old
field school." At the age of eighteen he entered the law-office of
Spruce McCay, in Salisbury. While there he was said to have been "the
most roaring, rollicking, game-cocking, horse-racing, card-playing, mischievous
fellow" that had ever been seen in that town. Many and plentiful were
the wild-oat crops sown at that time and in that part of the country; and in
such sort of agriculture young Jackson was much more proficient than in the
study of jurisprudence. He never had a legal tone of mind, or any but the
crudest knowledge of law; but in that frontier society a small amount of legal
knowledge went a good way, and in 1788 he was appointed public prosecutor for
the western district of North Carolina, the district since erected into the
state of Tennessee.
The emigrant wagon-train in which Jackson journeyed to Nashville carried news
of the ratification of the Federal constitution by the requisite two thirds of
the states. He seems soon to have found business enough. In the April term of
1790, out of 192 cases on the dockets of the county court at Nashville, Jackson
was employed as counsel in 42; in the year 1794, out of 397 cases he acted as
counsel in 228; while at the same time he was practicing his profession in the
courts of other counties. The great number of these cases is an indication of
their trivial character. As a general rule they were either actions growing out
of disputed land-claims or simple cases of assault and battery.
Court day was a great occasion in that wild community, bringing crowds of men
into the county town to exchange gossip, discuss politics, drink whiskey, and
break heads. Probably each court day produced as many new cases as it settled.
Amid such a turbulent population the public prosecutor must needs be a man of
nerve and resource. It was a state of chronic riot, in which he must be ever
ready to court danger. Jackson proved himself quite equal to the task of
introducing law and order in so far as it depended on him. "Just inform
Mr. Jackson," said Governor Blount when sundry malfeasances were
reported to high: "he will be sure to do his duty, and the offenders
will be punished." Besides the lawless-ness of the white pioneer
population, there was the enmity of the Indians to be reckoned with. In the
immediate neighborhood of Nashville the Indians murdered, on the average, one
person every ten days.
From 1788 till 1795 Jackson performed the journey of nearly two hundred miles
between Nashville and Jonesboro twenty-two times; and on these occasions there
were many alarms from Indians, which sometimes grew into a forest campaign. In
one of these affairs, having nearly lost his life in an adventurous feat,
Jackson made the characteristic remark: "A miss is as good as a mile;
you see how near I can graze danger." It was this wild experience that
prepared the way for Jackson's eminence as an Indian-fighter. In the autumn of
1794 the Cherokees were so thoroughly punished by General Robertson's famous
Nickajack expedition that henceforth they thought it best to leave the Tennessee
settlements in peace. With the rapid increase of the white population which soon
followed, the community became more prosperous and more orderly. In the general
prosperity Jackson had an ample share, partly through the diligent practice of
his profession, partly through judicious purchases and sales of land.
With most men marriage is the most important event of their life; in
Jackson's career his marriage was peculiarly important. Rachel Donelson was a
native of North Carolina, daughter of Colonel John Donelson, a Virginia surveyor
in good circumstances, who in 1780 migrated to the neighborhood of Nashville in
a very remarkable boat-journey of 2,000 miles down the Holston and Tennessee
rivers and up the Cumberland. During an expedition to Kentucky some time
afterward, the blooming Rachel was wooed and won by Captain Lewis Robards. She
was an active, sprightly, and interesting girl, the best horsewoman and best
dancer in that country; her husband seems to have been a young man of tyrannical
and unreasonably jealous disposition. In Kentucky they lived with Mrs. Robards,
the husband's mother; and, as was common in a new society where houses were too
few and far between, there were other boarders in the family--among them the
late Judge Overton, of Tennessee, and a, Mr. Stone. Presently Robards made
complaints against his wife, in which he implicated Stone. According to Overton
and the elder Mrs. Robards, these complaints were unreasonable and groundless,
but the affair ended in Robards sending his wife home to her mother in
Tennessee.
This was in 1788. Colonel Donelson had been murdered, either by Indians or by
white desperadoes, and his widow, albeit in easy circumstances, felt it
desirable to keep boarders as a means of protection against the Indians. To her
house came Andrew Jackson on his arrival at Nashville, and thither about the
same time came Overton, also fresh from his law studies. These two young men
were boarded in the house and lodged in a cabin hard by. At about the same time
Robards became reconciled with his wife, and, having bought land in the
neighborhood, came to dwell for awhile at Mrs. Donelson's. Throughout life
Jackson was noted alike for spotless purity and for a romantic and chivalrous
respect for the female sex. In the presence of women his manner was always
distinguished for grave and courtly politeness. This involuntary homage to woman
was one of the finest and most winsome features in his character. As
unconsciously rendered to Mrs. Robards, it was enough to revive the slumbering
demon of jealousy in her husband. According to Overton's testimony, Jackson's
conduct was irreproachable, but there were high words between him and Robards,
and, not wishing to make further trouble, he changed his place of abode.
After some months Captain Robards left his wife and went to Kentucky,
threatening by and by to return and "haunt her" and make her
miserable. In the autumn of 1790 rumors of his intended return frightened Mrs.
Robards, and determined her to visit some friends at distant Natchez in order to
avoid him. In pursuance of this plan, with which the whole neighborhood seems to
have concurred, she went down the river in company with the venerable Colonel
Stark and his family. As the Indians were just then on the war-path, Jackson
accompanied the party with an armed escort, returning to Nashville as soon as he
had seen his friends safely deposited at Natchez. While these things were going
on, the proceedings of Captain Robards were characterized by a sort of
Machiavelian astuteness.
In 1791 Kentucky was still a part of Virginia, and, according to the code of
the Old Dominion, if a husband wished to obtain a divorce on account of his
wife's alleged unfaithfulness, he must procure an act of the legislature
empowering him to bring the case before a jury, and authorizing a divorce
conditionally upon the jury's finding a verdict of guilty. Early in 1791 Robards
obtained the preliminary act of the legislature upon his declaration, then
false, that his wife had gone to live with Jackson. Robards deferred further
action for more than two years. Meanwhile it was reported and believed in the
west that a divorce had been granted, and, acting upon this report, Jackson,
whose chivalrous interest in Mrs. Robards's misfortunes had ripened into sincere
affection, went, in the summer of 1791, to Natchez and married her there, and
brought her to his home at Nashville.
In the autumn of 1793 Captain Robards, on the strength of the facts that
undeniably existed since the act of the Virginia legislature, brought his case
into court and obtained the verdict completing the divorce. On hearing of this,
to his great surprise, in December, Jackson concluded that the best method of
preventing future cavil was to procure a new license and have the marriage
ceremony performed again and this was done in January. Jackson was certainly to
blame for not taking more care to ascertain the import of the act of the
Virginia legislature. By a carelessness peculiarly striking in a lawyer, he
allowed his wife to be placed in a false position. The irregularity of the
marriage was indeed atoned by forty years of honorable and happy wedlock, ending
only with Mrs. Jackson's death in December, 1831 and no blame was attached to
the parties in Nashville, where the circumstances were well known. But the
story, half understood and maliciously warped, grew into scandal as it was
passed about among Jack on s personal enemies or political opponents; and herein
some of the bitterest of his many quarrels had their source. His devotion to
Mrs. Jackson was intense, and his pistol was always ready for the rash man who
should dare to speak of her slightingly.
In January, 1796, we find Jackson sitting in the convention assembled at
Knoxville for making a constitution for Tennessee, and tradition has it that he
proposed the name of the "Great Crooked River" as the name for
the new state. Among the rules adopted by the convention, one is quaintly
significant; "He that digresseth from the subject to fall on the person
of any member shall be suppressed by the speaker." The admission of
Tennessee to the Union was effected in June, 1796, in spite of earnest
opposition from the Federalists, and in the autumn Jackson was chosen as the
single representative in congress. When the house had assembled, he heard President
Washington deliver in person his last message to congress. He was one of
twelve who voted against the adoption of the address to Washington in approval
of his administration. Jackson's chief objections to Washington's government
were directed against two of its most salutary and admirable acts--the Jay
Treaty with Great Britain, and Hamilton's financial measures. His feeling
toward the Jay Treaty was that of a man who could not bear to see anything but
blows dealt to Great Britain. His condemnation of Hamilton's policy was mingled
with the not unreasonable feeling of distrust which he had already begun to
harbor against a national bank.
The year 1797 was a season of financial depression, and the general paralysis
of business was ascribed --no doubt too exclusively--to the over-issue of notes
by the national bank. Jackson's antipathy to such an institution would seem to
have begun thus early to show itself. Of his other votes in this congress, one
was for an appropriation to defray the expenses of Sevier's expedition against
the Cherokees, which was carried "three others were eminently wise and
characteristic of the man" 1. For finishing the three frigates then
building and destined to such renown--the "Constitution,"
"Constellation," and "United States." 2. Against
the further payment of blackmail to Algiers. 3. Against removing "the
restriction which confined the expenditure of public money to the specific
objects for which each sum was appropriated." Another vote, silly in
itself, was characteristic of the representative from a rough frontier community
it was against the presumed extravagance of appropriating $14,000 to buy
furniture for the newly built White House.
Jackson's course was warmly approved by his constituents, and in the
following summer he was chosen to fill a vacancy in the Federal senate. Of his
conduct as senator nothing is known beyond the remark, made by Jefferson in 1824
to Daniel Webster, that he had often, when presiding in the senate, seen the
passionate, Jackson get up to speak and then choke with rage so that he could
not utter a word. As Parton very happily suggests, one need not wonder at this
if one remembers what was the subject chiefly before the senate during the
winter of 1797-'8. The outrageous insolence of the French Directory was enough
to arouse the wrath of far tamer and less patriotic spirits than Jackson's. Yet
in a letter written at that time he seems eager to see the British throne
overturned by Bonaparte.
In April, 1798, he resigned his seat in the senate, and was appointed judge
in the supreme court of Tennessee. He retained this office for six years, but
nothing is known of his decisions, as the practice of recording decisions began
only with his successor, Judge Overton. During this period he was much harassed
by business troubles arising from the decline in the value of land consequent
upon the financial crisis of 1798. At length, in 1804, he resigned his judgeship
in order to devote his attention exclusively to his private affairs. He paid up
all his debts and engaged extensively both in planting and in trade. He was
noted for fair and honorable dealing, his credit was always excellent, and a
note with his name on it was considered as good as gold. He had a clear head for
business, and was never led astray by the delusions about paper money by which
American frontier communities have so often been infested. His plantation was
well managed, and his slaves were always kindly and considerately treated.
But while genial and kind toward his inferiors, he was among his
fellow-citizens apt to be rough and quarrelsome. In 1795 he fought a duel with
Avery, an opposing counsel, over some hasty words that had passed in the
court-room. Next year he quarreled with John Sevier, governor of Tennessee, and
came near shooting him "at sight." Sevier had alluded to the
circumstances of his marriage. Ten years afterward, for a similar offence,
though complicated with other matters in the course of a long and extremely
silly quarrel, he fought a duel with Charles Dickinson. The circumstances were
revolting, but showed Jackson's wonderful nerve and rare skill in "grazing
danger." Dickinson was killed, and Jackson received a wound from the
effects of which he never recovered. In later years, when he was a candidate for
the presidency, the number of his violent quarrels was variously reckoned by his
enemies at from a dozen to a hundred.
In 1805 Jackson was visited by Aaron Burr, who
was then preparing his mysterious southwestern expedition. Burr seems to have
wished, if possible, to make use of Jackson s influence in raising troops, but
without indicating his purpose. In this he was unsuccessful, but Jackson appears
to have regarded the charge of treason brought against Burr as ill-founded. At
Richmond, while Burr's trim was going on, Jackson made a speech attacking ,
Jefferson. He thus made himself obnoxious to Madison, then secretary of state,
and afterward, in 1808, he declared his preference for Monroe
over Madison as candidate for the presidency. He
was known as unfriendly to Madison's administration, but this did not prevent
him from offering his services, with those of 2,500 men, as soon as war was
declared against Great Britain in 1812.
Since 1801 he had been commander-in-chief of the Tennessee militia, but there
had been no occasion for him to take the field. Late in 1812, after the
disasters in the northwest, it was feared that the British might make an attempt
upon New Orleans, and Jackson was ordered
down to Natchez at the head of 2,000 men. He went in high spirits, promising to
plant the American eagle upon the ramparts of Mobile, Pensacola, and St.
Augustine, if so directed. On 6 February, as it had become evident that the
British were not meditating a southward expedition, the new secretary of war,
Armstrong, sent word to Jackson to disband his troops. This stupid order reached
the general at Natchez toward the end of March, and inflamed his wrath. He took
upon himself the responsibility of marching his men home in a body, an act in
which the government afterward acquiesced and reimbursed Jackson for the expense
involved. During this march Jackson became the idol of his troops, and his
sturdiness won him the nickname of "Old Hickory," by which he
was affectionately known among his friends and followers for the rest of his
life.
The war with Great Britain was complicated with an Indian war which could not
in any case have been avoided. The westward progress of the white settlers
toward the Mississippi river was gradually driving the red man from his
hunting-grounds; and the celebrated Tecumseh had formed a scheme, quite similar
to that of Pontiac fifty years earlier, Of uniting all the tribes between
Florida and the Great Lakes in a grand attempt to drive back the white men. This
scheme was partially frustrated in the autumn of 1811 while Tecumseh was
preaching his crusade among the Cherokees, Creeks, and Seminoles. During his
absence his brother, known as the Prophet, attacked General Harrison at
Tippecanoe and was overwhelmingly defeated. The war with Great Britain renewed
Tecumseh's opportunity, and his services to the enemy were extremely valuable
until his death in the battle of the Thames. Tecumseh's principal ally in the
south was a half-breed Creek chieftain named Weathersford. On the shore of Lake
Tensaw, in the southern part of what is now Alabama, was a stockaded fortress
known as Fort Mimms. There many of the settlers had taken refuge. On 30 August,
1813, this stronghold was surprised by Weathersford at the head of 1,000 Creek
warriors, and more than 400 men, women, and children were massacred. The news of
this dreadful affair aroused the people of the southwest to vengeance.
Men and money were raised by the state of Tennessee, and, before he had fully
recovered from the wound received in the Benton affray, Jackson took the field
at the head of 2,500 men. Now for the first time he had a chance to show his
wonderful military capacity, his sleepless vigilance, untiring patience, and
unrivalled talent as a leader of men. The difficulties encountered were
formidable in the extreme. In that frontier wilderness the business of the
commissariat was naturally ill managed, and the men, who under the most
favorable circumstances had little idea of military subordination, were part of
the time mutinous from hunger. More than once Jackson was obliged to use one
half of his army to keep the other half from disbanding. In view of these
difficulties, the celerity of his movements and the force with which he struck
the enemy were truly marvellous. The Indians were defeated at Talluschatches and
Talladega. At length, on 27 March, 1814, having been re-enforced by a regiment
of United States infantry, Jackson struck the decisive blow at Tohopeka,
otherwise known as the Horseshoe Bend or the Tallapoosa river. In this bloody
battle no quarter was given, and the strength of the Creek nation was finally
broken. Jackson pursued the remnant to their place of refuge called the Holy
Ground, upon which the medicine-men had declared that no white man could set
foot and live. Such of the Creek chieftains as had not fled to Florida now
surrendered. The American soldiers were ready to kill Weathersford in revenge
for Fort Mimms; but Jackson, who was by no means wanting in magnanimity, spared
his life and treated him so well that henceforth he and his people remained on
good terms with the white men.
Among the officers who served under Jackson in this remarkable campaign were
two who in later years played an important part in the history of the
southwest--Samuel Houston and David Crockett.
The Creek war was one of critical importance. It was the last occasion on which
the red men could put forth sufficient power to embarrass the United States
government. More than any other single battle that of Tohopeka marks the
downfall of Indian power. Its immediate effects upon the war with Great Britain
were very great. By destroying the only hostile power within the southwestern
territory it made it possible to concentrate the military force of the border
states upon any point, however remote, that might be threatened by the British.
More specifically, it made possible the great victory at, New Orleans.
Throughout the whole of this campaign, in which Jackson showed such indomitable
energy, he was suffering from illness such as would have kept any ordinary man
groaning in bed, besides that for most of the time his left arm had to be
supported in a sling. The tremendous pluck exhibited by William of Orange at
Neerwinden, and so justly celebrated by Macaulay, was no greater than Jackson
showed in Alabama. His pluck was equaled by his thoroughness. Many generals
after victory are inclined to relax their efforts. Not so Jackson, who followed
up every success with furious persistence, and whose admirable maxim was that in
war "until all is done, nothing is done."
On 31 May, 1814, Jackson was made major-general in the regular army, and was
appointed to command the Department of the South. It was then a matter of
dispute whether Mobile belonged to Spain or to the United States. In August,
Jackson occupied the town and made his headquarters there. With the consent of
Spain the British used Florida as a base of operations and established
themselves at Pensacola. Jackson wrote to Washington for permission to attack
them there; but the government was loth to sanction an invasion of Spanish
territory until the complicity of Spain with our enemy should be proved beyond
cavil. The letter from Sec. Armstrong to this effect did not reach Jackson. The
capture of Washington by the British prevented his receiving orders and left him
to act upon his own responsibility, a kind of situation from which he was never
known to flinch. On 14 September the British advanced against Mobile; but in
their attack upon the outwork, Fort Bowyer, they met with a disastrous repulse.
They retreated to Pensacola, whither Jackson followed them with 3,000 men. On 7
November he stormed the town.
His next move would have been against Fort Barrancas, six miles distant at
the mouth of the harbor. By capturing this post he would have entrapped the
British fleet and might have forced it to surrender; but the enemy forestalled
him by blowing up the fort and beating a precipitate retreat. By thus driving
the British from Florida--an act for which he was stupidly blamed by the
Federalist press--Jackson now found himself free to devote all his energies to
the task of defending New Orleans, and there, after an arduous journey, he
arrived on 2 December The British expedition directed against that city was more
formidable than any other that we had to encounter during that war. Its purpose
was also more deadly. In the north the British warfare had been directed chiefly
toward defending Canada and gaining such a foothold upon our frontier as might
be useful in making terms at the end of the war.
The burning of Washington was intended chiefly for all insult and had but
slight military significance; but the expedition against New Orleans was
intended to make a permanent conquest of the lower Mississippi valley and to
secure for Great Britain the western bank of the river. The fall of Napoleon had
set, free Some of Wellington's finest troops for service in America, and in
December a force of 12,000 men, under command of Wellington's brother-in-law,
the gallant Sir Edward Pakenham, was landed below New Orleans. To oppose these
veterans of the Spanish peninsula, Jackson had 6,000 of that sturdy race whose
fathers had vanquished Ferguson at King's Mountain, and whose children so nearly
vanquished Grant at Shiloh. After considerable preliminary maneuvering and
skirmishing, Jackson entrenched himself in a strong position near the Bienvenu
and Chalmette plantations and awaited the approach of the enemy. His
headquarters, the McCarte mansion, is shown below.
On 8 January, Pakenham was unwise enough to try to overwhelm him by a direct
assault. In less than half an hour the British were in full retreat, leaving
2,600 of their number killed and wounded. Among the slain was Pakenham. The
American loss was eight killed and thirteen wounded. Never, perhaps, in the
history of the world has a battle been fought between armies of civilized men
with so great a disparity of loss. It was also the most complete and
overwhelming defeat that any English army has ever experienced. News traveled so
slowly then that this great victory, like the three last naval victories of the
war, occurred after peace had been made by the commissioners
at Ghent. Nevertheless, no American can regret that the battle was fought.
The insolence and rapacity of Great Britain had richly deserved such
castigation. Moreover, if she once gained a foothold in the Mississippi valley,
it might have taken an armed force to dislodge her in spite of the treaty, for
in the matter of the western frontier posts after 1783 she had by no means acted
in good faith.
Jackson's victory decided that henceforth the Mississippi valley
belonged indisputably to the people of the United States. It was the
recollection of that victory, along with the exploits of Hull and Decatur, Perry
and McDonough, which caused the Holy Alliance to look upon the Monroe
doctrine as something more than an idle threat. All over the United States
the immediate effect of the news was electric, and it was enhanced by the news
of peace which arrived a few days later. By this "almost incredible
victory," as the "National Intelligencer" called it,
the credit of the American arms upon land was fully restored. Not only did the
administration glory in it, as was natural, but the opposition lauded it for a
different reason, as an example of what American military heroism could do in
spite of inadequate support from government. Thus praised by all parties,
Jackson, who before the Creek war had been little known outside of Tennessee,
became at once the foremost man in the United States. People in the north, while
throwing up their hats for him, were sometimes heard to ask: "Who is
this General Jackson? To what state does he belong?" Henceforth until
the civil war he occupied the most prominent place in the popular mind.
After his victory Jackson remained three months in New Orleans, in some
conflict with the civil authorities of the town, which he found it necessary to
hold under martial law. In April he returned to Nashville, still retaining his
military command of the southwest. He soon became involved in a quarrel with Mr.
Crawford, the secretary of war, who had undertaken to modify some provisions in
his treaty with the Creeks. Jackson was also justly incensed by the occasional
issue of orders from the war department directly to his subordinate officers;
such orders sometimes stupidly thwarted his plans. The usual course for a
commanding general thus annoyed would be to make a private representation to the
government; but here, as ordinarily, while quite right in his position, Jackson
was violent and overbearing in his methods. He published, 22 April, 1817, all
order forbidding his subordinate officers to pay heed to any order from the war
department unless issued through him.
Mr. Calhoun, who in October succeeded Crawford as secretary of war,
gracefully yielded the point; but the public had meanwhile been somewhat
scandalized by the collision of authorities. In private conversation General
Scott had alluded to Jackson's conduct as savoring of mutiny. This led to an
angry correspondence between the two generals, ending in a challenge from
Jackson, which Scott declined on the ground that dueling is a wicked and
unchristian custom.
Affairs in Florida now demanded attention. That country had become a nest of
outlaws, and chaos reigned supreme there. Many of the defeated Creeks had found
a refuge in Florida, and runaway Negroes from the plantations of Georgia and
South Carolina were continually escaping thither. During the late war British
officers and adventurers, acting on their own responsibility upon this neutral
soil, committed many acts which their government would never have sanctioned.
They stirred up Indians and Negroes to commit atrocities on the United States
frontier. The Spanish government was at that time engaged in warfare with its
revolted colonies in South America, and the coasts of Florida became a haunt for
contraband traders, privateers, and filibusters. One adventurer would announce
his intention to make Florida a free republic; another would go about committing
robbery on his own account; a third would set up an agency for kidnapping Negroes
on speculation.
The disorder was hideous. On the Appalachicola river the British had
built a fort, and amply stocked it with arms and ammunition, to serve as a base
of operations against the United States. On the departure of the British, the
fort was seized and held by Negroes. This alarmed the slave-owners of Georgia,
and in July, 1816, United States troops, with permission from the Spanish
authorities, marched in and bombarded the Negro fort. A hot shot found its way
into the magazine, three hundred Negroes were blown into fragments, and the fort
was demolished. In this case the Spaniards were ready to leave to United States
troops a disagreeable work, for which their own force was incompetent. Every day
made it plainer that Spain was quite unable to preserve order in Florida, and
for this reason the United States entered upon negotiations for the purchase of
that country. Meanwhile the turmoil increased. White men were murdered by
Indians, and United States troops, under Colonel Twiggs, captured and burned a
considerable Seminole village, known as Fowltown. The Indians retorted by the
wholesale massacre of fifty people who were ascending the Appalachicola river in
boats; some of the victims were tortured with firebrands.
Jackson was now ordered to the frontier, he wrote at once to President
Monroe: "Let it be signified to me through any channel (say Mr. John
Rhea) that the possession of the Floridas would be desirable to the United
States, and in sixty days it will be accomplished." Mr. Rhea was a
representative from Tennessee, a confidential friend of both Jackson and Monroe.
The president was ill when Jackson's letter reached him, and does not seem to
have given it due consideration. On referring to it a year later he could not
remember that he had ever seen it, before. Rhea, however, seems to have written
a letter to Jackson, telling him that the president approved of his suggestion.
As to this point the united testimony of Jackson, Rhea, and Judge Overton seems
conclusive. Afterward Mr. Monroe, through Rhea, seems to have requested Jackson
to burn this letter, and an entry on the general's letter-book shows that it was
accordingly burned, 12 April, 1819. There can be no doubt that, whatever the
president's intention may have been, or how far it may have been correctly
interpreted by Rhea, the general honestly considered himself authorized to take
possession of Florida on the ground that the Spanish government had shown itself
incompetent to prevent the denizens of that country from engaging in hostilities
against the United States. Jackson acted upon this belief with his accustomed
promptness.
He raised troops in Tennessee and neighboring states, invaded Florida in
March, 1818, captured St. Marks, and pushed on to the Seminole headquarters on
the Suwanee river. In less than three months from this time he had overthrown
the Indians and brought order out of chaos. His measures were praised by his
friends as vigorous, while his enemies stigmatized them as high-handed. In one
instance his conduct was open to serious question. At St. Marks his troops
captured an aged Scotch trader and friend of the Indians, flamed Alexander
Arbuthnot; near Suwanee, some time afterward, they seized Robert Ambrister, a
young English lieutenant of marines, nephew of the governor of New Providence.
Jackson believed that these men had incited the Indians to make war upon the
United States, anti were now engaged in aiding and abetting them in their
hostilities. They were tried by a court-martial at St. Marks. On very
insufficient evidence Arbuthnot was found guilty and sentenced to be hanged.
Appearances were somewhat more strongly against Ambrister. He did not make it
clear what his business was in Florida, and threw himself upon the mercy of the
court, which at first condemned him to be shot, put on further consideration
commuted the sentence to fifty lashes and a year's imprisonment. Jackson
arbitrarily revived the first sentence, and Ambrister was accordingly shot. A
few minutes afterward Arbuthnot was hanged from the yardarm of his own ship,
declaring with his last breath that his country would avenge him. In this
lamentable affair Jackson doubtless acted from a sense of duty, as he himself
said, "My God would not have smiled on me, had I punished only the poor
ignorant savages, and spared the white men who set them on." Here, as
elsewhere, however, when under the influence of strong feeling, he showed
himself utterly incapable of estimating evidence the ease against both the
victims was so weak that a fair-minded and prudent commander would surely have
pardoned them; while the interference with the final sentence of the court, in
Ambrister's ease, was an act that can hardly be justified. Throughout life
Jackson was perpetually acting with violent energy upon the strength of opinions
hastily formed and based upon inadequate data. Fortunately, his instincts were
apt to be sound, and in many most important instances his violent action was
highly beneficial to his country; but a man of such temperament is liable to
make serious mistakes.
On his way home, hearing that some Indians had sought refuge in Pensacola,
Jackson captured the town, turned out the Spanish governor, and left a garrison
of his own there. He bad now virtually conquered Florida, but he had moved too
fast for the government at Washington. He had gone further, perhaps, than was
permissible in trespassing upon neutral territory; and his summary execution of
two British subjects aroused furious excitement in England. For a moment we
seemed on the verge of war with Great Britain and Spain at once. Whatever
authority President Monroe may have intended, through the Rhea letter, to confer
upon Jackson, he certainly felt that the general had gone too far. With one
exception, all his cabinet agreed with him that it would be best to disavow
Jackson's acts and make reparation for them. But John
Quincy Adams, secretary of state, felt equal to the task of dealing with the
two foreign powers, and upon his advice the administration decided to assume the
responsibility for what Jackson had done. Pensacola and St. Marks were restored
to Spain, and an order of Jackson's for the seizing of St. Augustine was
countermanded by the president. But Adams represented to Spain that the American
general, in his invasion of Florida, was virtually assisting the Spanish
government in maintaining order there; and to Great Britain he justified the
execution of Arbuthnot and Ambrister on the ground that their conduct had been
such that they had forfeited their allegiance and become virtual outlaws.
Spain and Great Britain accepted the explanations; had either nation felt in
the mood for war with the United States, it might have been otherwise. As soon
as the administration had adopted Jackson's measures, they were for that reason
attacked in congress by Clay, and this was the beginning of the bitter and
lifelong feud between Jackson and Clay. In 1819 the purchase of Florida from
Spain was effected, and in 1821 Jackson was appointed governor of that
territory. In 1823 he was elected to the United States senate. Some of his
friends, under the lead of William 13. Lewis, had already conceived the idea of
making him president. At first General Jackson cast ridicule upon the idea. "Do
they suppose," said he, "that I am such a damn fool as to think
myself fit for president of the United States? No, sir, I know what I am fit
for. I can command a body of men in a rough way, but I am not fit to be
president." Such is the anecdote told by H. M. Brackenridge, who was
Jackson's secretary in Florida.
In 1821 the general felt old and weak, and had made up his mind to spend his
remaining days in peace on his farm. Of personal ambition, as ordinarily
understood, Jackson had much less than many other men. But he was, like most
men, susceptible to flattery, and the discovery of his immense popularity no
doubt went far to persuade him that he might do credit to himself as president.
On 20 July, 1822, he was nominated for that office by the legislature of
Tennessee. On 22 February, 1824, he was nominated by a Federalist convention at
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and on 4 March following by a Republican convention at
the same place, the regular nominee of the congressional caucus was W. H.
Crawford, of Georgia. The other candidates were J. Q. Adams and Henry Clay.
There was a general agreement upon Calhoun for the vice presidency. All the
candidates belonged to the Republican party, which had kept the presidency since
Jefferson's election in 1800.
The Federalists were hopelessly discredited by their course in the war of
1812-'15. Of the four candidates, Adams and Clay were loose constructionists,
while Crawford and Jackson were strict constructionists, and in this difference
was foreshadowed a new division of parties. At the election in November, 1824,
there were 99 electoral votes for Jackson, 84 for Adams, 41 for Crawford, and 37
for Clay. As none of the candidates had a majority, it was left for the house of
representatives to choose a president from the three highest names on the list,
in accordance with the twelfth amendment to the constitution. As Clay was thus
rendered ineligible, there was naturally some scheming among the friends of the
other candidates to secure his powerful co-operation. Clay and his friends quite
naturally supported the other loose-constructionist candidate, Adams, with the
result that 13 states voted for Adams, 7 for Jackson, and 4 for Crawford. Adams
thus became president, and Jackson's friends, in their disappointment, hungered
for a "grievance" upon which they might vent their displeasure,
and which might serve as a "rallying cry" for the next
campaign. Benton, who was now one of Jackson's foremost supporters, went so far
as to maintain that, because Jackson had a greater number of electoral votes
than any other candidate, the house was virtually "defying the will of
the people" in choosing any name but his. To this it was easily
answered that in any case our electoral college, which was one of the most
deliberately framed devices of the constitution, gives but a very indirect and
partial expression of the "will of the people"; and
furthermore, if Benton's argument was sound, why should the constitution have
provided for an election by congress, instead of allowing a simple plurality in
the college to decide the election?
The extravagance of Benton's objection, coming from so able a source, is an
index to the bitter disappointment of Jackson's followers. The needed "grievance"
was furnished when Adams selected Clay as his secretary of state. Many of
Jackson's friends interpreted this appointment as the result of a bargain
whereby Clay had made Adams president in consideration of obtaining the first
place in the cabinet, carrying with it, according to the notion then prevalent,
a fair prospect of the succession to the presidency. It was natural enough for
the friends of a disappointed candidate to make such a charge. It was to
Benton's credit that he always scouted the idea of a corrupt bargain between
Adams and Clay. Many people, however, believed it. In congress, John Randolph's
famous allusion to the coalition between Blifil and Black George --"the
Puritan and the blackleg" -- led to a duel between Randolph and Clay, which
served to impress the matter upon the popular mind without enlightening it; the
pistol is of small value as an agent of enlightenment. The charge was utterly
without support and in every way improbable. The excellence of the appointment
of Clay was beyond cavil, and the sternly upright Adams was less influenced by
what people might think of his actions than any other president since
Washington. But the appointment was no doubt ill-considered. It made it
necessary for Clay, in many a public speech, to defend himself against the cruel
imputation. To mention the charge to Jackson, whose course in Florida had been
censured by Clay, was enough to make him believe it; and he did so to his dying
day.It is not likely that the use made of this "grievance" had
much to do with Jackson's victory in 1828.
The causes at work lay far deeper. The population west of the Alleghenies was
now beginning to count for much in politics. Jackson was our first western
president, and his election marks the rise of that section of our country. The
democratic tendency was moreover a growing one. Heretofore our presidents had
been men of aristocratic type, with advantages of wealth, or education, or
social training. A stronger contrast to them than Jackson afforded cannot well
be imagined. A man with less training in statesmanship would have been hard to
find. In his defects he represented average humanity, while his excellences were
such as the most illiterate citizen could appreciate. In such a man the
ploughboy and the blacksmith could feel that in some essential respects they had
for president one of their own sort. Above all, he was the great military hero
of the day, and as such he came to the presidency as naturally as Taylor and
Grant in later days, as naturally as his contemporary Wellington became prime
minister of England. A man far more politic and complaisant than Adams could not
have won the election of 1828 against such odds. He obtained 83 electoral votes
against 178 for Jackson. Calhoun was re-elected vice president. Jackson came to
the presidency with a feeling that he had at length succeeded in making good his
claim to a violated right, and he showed this feeling in his refusal to call on
his illustrious predecessor, who he declared had got the presidency by bargain
and sale.
In Jackson's cabinet, as first constituted, Martin Van Buren, of New York,
was secretary of state; Samuel D. Ingham, of Pennsylvania, secretary of the
treasury; John H. Eaton, of Tennessee, secretary of war; John Branch, of North
Carolina, secretary of the navy; John M. Berrien, of Georgia, attorney-general;
William T. Barry, of Kentucky, postmaster-general. As compared with earlier
cabinets--not merely with such men as Hamilton, Madison, or Gallatin, but with
Pickering. Wolcott, Monroe, or even Crawford--these were obscure names. The
innovation in the personal character of the cabinet was even more marked than
the innovation in the presidency. The autocratic Jackson employed his
secretaries as clerks. His confidential advisers were a few intimate friends who
held no important offices. These men--W. B. Lewis, Amos Kendall, Duff Green, and
Isaac Hill--came to be known as the "kitchen cabinet." Lewis
had had much to do with bringing Jackson forward as a candidate for the
presidency in 1821. Green and Hill were editors of partisan newspapers. Kendall
was a man of considerable ability and many good qualities, but a "machine
politician" of the worst sort. He was on many occasions the ruling
spirit of the administration, and the cause of some of its most serious
mistakes. Jackson's career as president cannot be fully understood without
taking into account the agency of Kendall; yet it is not always easy to assign
the character and extent of the influence which he exerted.
A yet more notable innovation was Jackson's treatment of the civil service.
The earlier presidents had proceeded upon the theory that public office is a
public trust, and not a reward for partisan services. They conducted the
business of government upon business principles, and as long as a postmaster
showed himself efficient in distributing the mail they did not turn him out of
office because of his vote. Between 30 April, 1789, and 4 March, 1829, the total
number of removals from office was seventy-four, and out of this number five
were defaulters. Between 4 March, 1829, and 22 March, 1830, the number of
changes made in the civil service was about 2,000. This was the inauguration
upon a national scale of the so-called "spoils system." The
phrase originated with William L. Marcy, of New York, who in a speech in the
senate in 1831 declared that "to the victors belong the
spoils."
The system had been perfected in the state politics of New York and
Pennsylvania, and it was probably inevitable that it should sooner or later be
introduced into the sphere of national politics. The way was prepared in 1820 by
Crawford, when he succeeded in getting the law passed that limits the tenure of
office to four years. This dangerous measure excited very little discussion at
the time. People could not understand the evil until taught by hard experience.
Jackson did not understand that he was laying the foundations of a gigantic
system of corruption, which within a few years would develop into the most
serious of the dangers threatening the continuance of American freedom, he was
very ready to believe ill of political opponents, and to make generalizations
from extremely inadequate data. Democratic newspapers, while the campaign frenzy
was on them, were full of windy declamation about the wholesale corruption
introduced into all parts of the government by Adams and Clay. Nothing was too
bad for Jackson to believe of these two men, and when the fourth auditor of the
treasury was found to be delinquent in his accounts it was easy to suppose that
many others were, in one way or another, just as bad. In his wholesale removals
Jackson doubtless supposed he was doing the country a service by "turning
the rascals out."
The immediate consequence of this demoralizing policy was a struggle for
control of the patronage between Calhoun and Van Buren, who were rival aspirants
for the succession to the presidency. A curious affair now came in to influence
Jackson's personal relations to these men. Early in 1829 Eaton, secretary of
war, married a Mrs. Timberlake, with whose reputation gossip had been busy. It
was said that he had shown her too much attention during the lifetime of her
first husband. Jackson was always slow to believe charges against a woman. His
own wife, who had been outrageously maligned by the Whig newspapers during the
campaign, had lately died, and there was just enough outward similarity between
Eaton's marriage and his own to make him take Mrs. Eaton's part with more than
his customary vehemence. Mrs. Calhoun and the wives of the secretaries would not
recognize Mrs. Eaton. Mrs. Donelson, wife of the president's nephew, and
mistress of ceremonies at the White House, took a similar stand. Jackson scolded
his secretaries and sent Mrs. Donelson home to Tennessee; but all in vain. He
found that vanquishing Wellington's veterans was a light task compared with that
of contending against the ladies in an affair of this sort.
Foremost among those who frowned Mrs. Eaton out of society was Mrs. Calhoun.
On the other hand, Van Buren, a widower, found himself able to be somewhat more
complaisant, and accordingly rose in Jackson's esteem. The fires were fanned by
Lewis and Kendall, who saw in Van Buren a more eligible ally than Calhoun.
Presently intelligence was obtained from Crawford, who hated Calhoun, to the
effect that the latter, as member of Monroe's cabinet, had disapproved of
Jackson's conduct in Florida. This was quite true, but Calhoun had discreetly
yielded his judgment to that of the cabinet led by Adams, and thus had
officially sanctioned Jackson's conduct. These facts, as handled by Eaton and
Lewis, led Jackson to suspect Calhoun of treacherous double-dealing, and the
result was a quarrel which broke up the cabinet.
In order to get Calhoun's friends--Ingham, Branch, and Berrien--out of the
cabinet, the other secretaries began by resigning. This device did not succeed,
and the ousting of the three secretaries entailed further quarrelling, in the
course of which the Eaton affair and the Florida business were beaten threadbare
in the newspapers, and evoked sundry challenges to deadly combat. In the spring
and summer of 1831 the new cabinet was formed, consisting of Edward Livingston,
secretary of state; Louis McLane, treasury; Lewis Cass, war; Levi Woodbury,
navy; Roger B. Taney, attorney-general; in post office no change. On Van Butch's
resignation, Jackson at once appointed him minister to England, but there was a
warm dispute in the senate over his confirmation, and it was defeated at length
by the casting-vote of Calhoun. This check only strengthened Jackson's
determination to have Van Buren for his successor in the presidency. The
progress of this quarrel entailed a break in the "kitchen cabinet,"
in which Duff Green, editor of the "Telegraph" and friend of
Calhoun, was thrown out. His place was taken by Francis Preston Blair, of
Kentucky, a man of eminent ability and earnest patriotism. To him and his sons,
as energetic opponents of nullification and secession, our country owes a debt
of gratitude which can hardly be overstated. Blair's indignant attitude toward
nullification brought him at once into earnest sympathy with Jackson. In
December, 1830, Blair began publishing the "Globe," the organ
henceforth of Jackson's party. For a period of ten years, until the defeat of
the Democrats in 1840, Blair and Kendall were the ruling spirits in the
administration. Their policy was to re-elect Jackson to the presidency in 1832,
and make Van Buren his successor in 1836.
During Jackson's administration there came about a new division of parties.
The strict constructionists, opposing internal improvements, protective tariff,
and national banks, retained the name of Democrats, which had long been applied
to members of the old Republican party. The term Republican fell into disuse.
The loose constructionists, under the lead of Clay, took the name of Whigs, as
it suited their purposes to describe Jackson as a kind of tyrant; and they tried
to discredit their antagonists by calling them Tories, but the device found
little favor. On strict constructionist grounds Jackson in 1829 vetoed the bill
for a government subscription to the stock of the Maysville turnpike in
Kentucky, and two other similar bills he disposed of by a new method, which the
Whigs indignantly dubbed a "pocket veto."
Unauthorized Site:
This site and its contents are not affiliated, connected,
associated with or authorized by the individual, family,
friends, or trademarked entities utilizing any part or
the subject's entire name. Any official or affiliated
sites that are related to this subject will be hyper
linked below upon submission
and Evisum, Inc. review.
Please join us in our mission to incorporate The Congressional Evolution of the United States of America discovery-based curriculum into the classroom of every primary and secondary school in the United States of America by July 2, 2026, the nation’s 250th birthday. , the United States of America: We The
People. Click Here